|
|
 |
 |
4.17.2007
SACKING NATIONS AND CRIMINALIZING IMMIGRANTS
 If you look carefully at how the immigrant population in the United States and other European nations are being treated, you cannot help but see the connection to harassment and attributing the possibility of criminal acts to these people. Mainly, I speak of the people who are among us from the ME. It seems to be the seamless plan to cement terrorism and these people.
The entire Western world, Europe and the United States that has stolen trillions of dollars from these countries, treats their immigrants worse than second class citizens. Of course, they will exploit to the fullest their natural and human resources, but give something in return? Yeah right.... Citizenship in the United States and European countries seems to be at a premium, to say the least, these days.
The West not only steals the resources and enslaves the population in other countries, they are not satisfied with that - they must rig the ruling governments and destroy any hope for the future. When they have been totally degraded and unable to rise the Western countries disdain the peoples presence when they come to their shores in the hope of some future.
They give the impossible and oppressive task of languishing in dead end jobs so that they can barely survive to try to give their children something of value. Whether it is France that isolates the populations that they once exploited keeping them in squalor, with no hope for advance, trapped in the ghettos designed for them - or the United States, which wishes to portray them as worthless welfare cases, criminals, terrorists, and specifically that black and brown people that they love to hate - it's all the same.
Now, some will say "this is no different than immigrants in the past that had to pay their dues," they are sadly mistaken. During the times of inner Euro-American immigration their countries were not sacked nor their people enslaved by dictatorships set up by other Western entities. Nor were their people seen as "terrorists" until proven otherwise, and millions of their people were not exterminated by the edicts of foreign policy and "national security, or building democracies."
 The truth be told, the West is not done robbing these nations yet, and because this is the case they must continue to vilify these people - those who they wish to exploit they will vilify. Two prime case examples being the African continent and the Middle East, they are not done sacking them yet.
Considered very rich countries the West must make sure that their white population sees these people as worthless, trouble makers, terrorists, so that it gives them the "excuse" to make them into "democracies," which is a code word for enslavement, death, and destruction - or unresponsive governments that allow the people to rot.
Yet for a hundred years or more, the West has tirelessly exploited them and destroyed their hope for a future with puppet governments. It has forced the exploited, their populations, to work in torturous conditions, and has fed an elite in these countries with the largess that belongs to the people. It has eaten the substance which could by all rights sustain these people, because the countries are VERY RICH - it is just the people who are made poor.
So the elite devise these extra-national alliances, like the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and various trade agreements which do nothing but feed capitalistic corporations to the dtriment of the people. So what these entities tout as hope is nothing but a charade as they further prey upon those people. What I have written here has to become common knowledge and expressed broadly.
It is almost a damned if you do, and damned if you don't situation with immigration. One thing is for sure, the Western world cannot continue it's present course of exploitation in these countries and expect to stop the tide of immigration. As long as you have suppression as a policy in other countries people will look for ways to escape - and they will migrate to areas where there are further developed democratic processes, regardless of the fact that it might be receding.
FURTHER ISOLATION AND EXPLOITATION OF IMMIGRANTS IN WESTERN COUNTRIES WILL PRODUCE CONSEQUENT UNREST - IT CAN EITHER BE DEALT WITH THROUGH GREATER SINCERE OPPORTUNITY, OR CRIMINALIZING THE IMMIGRANT POPULATION. WHICH WAY DO YOU SEE IT GOING? TO ME THE PROGNOSIS LOOKS DIM - IT WILL REMAIN LIKE THIS AS LONG AS WE HAVE VORACIOUS UNCHECKED CAPITALISM AND FURTHER EXPLOITATION OF OTHER COUNTRIES, FORCING PEOPLE TO LEAVE IN ORDER TO EVEN SURVIVE. UNTIL THE EURO-AMERICAN ALLAINCE STOPS THE DESTRUCTION OR EXPLOITATION, THEY WILL HAVE TO LOOK AT IMMIGATION AS A FORM OF COLLECTING A DEBT THAT THEY HAVE INCURRED!
Posted at 08:57 pm by deadringer
Permalink
4.15.2007
SORRY WE KILLED YOUR CHILD - HERE IS $500.00
 Yes, you read the title right - fully looked at "sorry, we shot your child, we thought is book bag was a bomb, here is $500.00." The story is found on the oldest journal covering the news paper industry, Editor and Publisher, written by Greg Mitchell. You can find the story HERE.On the Angry Arab site I found a link which actually has some of the official paperwork, where a journalist was shot (no doubt of ME origin), where a father of four and his wife were given $2,500.00 for shooting the bread winner. By the way, Iraq is the worst place for journalists, many killed by America's "finest."
(Found at the Friday-Lunch-Club HERE.) Most of the information has been unearthed by the ACLU's diligence in requesting FOIA realease of some of the details. The Editor and Journal found that there were 500 cases released and all deserve broad attention.
Ponder with me, if you will, compared to the pittance given, that there is now about $32,000,000 dollars that have been paid out - how many civilians have been needlessly killed? We are also officially told, there is no way to trace whether the soldiers involved have been disciplined. Here are some of the examples -
"Claimant alleges that her two brothers were returning home with groceries from their business, when U.S. troops shot and killed them, thinking they were insurgents with bombs in the bags. I recommend approving this claim in the amount of $5,OOO."
------------------------------------------
Dec. 5 2005:
Claimant alleges that on the above date at the above mentioned location, the child was outside playing by their gate and a stray bullet from a U.S. soldier hit their son in the head and killed him. The U.S. soldiers went to the boy's funeral and apologized to the family and took their information to get to them, but never did. The child was nine years old and their only son.
I recommend approving this claim in the amount of $4,OOO.OO.
-------------------------------------------
April 15, 2005
Claimant alleges that on or about 24 February 2005, he was riding in a mini-bus with his nine-year-old son on his lap when Coalition Forces fired a round into the bus. The round allegedly hit his son in the head, causing the son's death later on. Xxxxx alleges that some Americans came to the hospital and apologized. He also states that one of the HMMWV's had "32" on the side. Claimant has enclosed an autopsy report.
Allow me to express my sympathy for your loss, however, in accordance with the cited references and after investigating your claim, I find that your claim is not compensable for the following reason: In vour claim you failed to provide suflicient evidence that U.S. Forces and not someone else is responsible for your damages. Accordingly, your claim must be denied.
--------------------------------------------
Incident occurred Jan. 6, 2005 at a bridge near Haifa Street
Claimant alleges that her husband, who was working as a journalist, was walking across the bridge when he was shot and killed by U.S. troops. She has documentation from CA confirming that US. troops were in the area at that time. Also, a medical report is attached stating that the round that killed the victim was a 5.56mm round. The claimant has submitted sufficient evidence.
I recommend approving this claim in the amount of $2,5OO.OO.
(She had asked for $5000)
--------------------------------------------
On 11 April 2005, Claimant's father was allegedly killed by CF forces near the Samarra Museum…Claimant says that his father was deaf and would not have heard danger nearby. The claimant did not personally witness the shooting and relies solely on eyewitnesses. Eye witnesses related that victim was shot by CF forces. The Claimant does not know if his father was shot by CF forces responding to an AIF attack, or whether CF fired directly on his father.
The claimant presented a claim in the amount of $4,000 on 21 November 2005.
RECOMMENDATION: this claim be denied.
--------------------------------------------
Dec. 5, 2004:
The issue presented is whether claimant may receive compensation for the death of his father, his mother, his brother and 32 sheeps.
In this case, the claimant has lost his entire family and his herd of sheep that provide a means of income. In addition, the claimant suffered gun shot wounds himself.
The claimant states that his family was sleeping when the shots were
fired that killed his family. He claims that the family had only one AK-47 that the father carried outside after his wife was shot in the head The coalition force may have been justified in shooting at another target where the claimant and his family would be collateral damage to that combat operation. However, the ROE require units to have positive identification of target before engaging. In this case, reports indicate that over one hundred rounds were fired that impacted around a flock of sheep and his sleeping family. Accordingly, it appears that the shooting, although not "wrongful", was conducted "negligently". It is therefore my opinion that there is sufficient evidence to justify compensation under the FCA.
I recommend that claimant be appoved in the amount claimed totaling $11,020.
--------------------------------------------
On 11 April 2005, at about 11:30 am, Claimant's 8 year old sister,
xxxx was allegedly killed by CF forces near the Al Khatib Secondary School, Samarra. xxxx says that his sister was playing near the school and was shot by CF. Deceased's death certificate ... she was killed by gunfire. The claimant did not personally witness the shooting and relies solely on eye witnesses. Eye witnesses related that victim was shot by CF forces by a "random shot." During the interview, it was impossible to clarify what the claimant meant by a "random shot." A SIGACTS investigation revealed no activity or incidents in Samarra on that date.
RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the investigation by this FCC, it is reasonable to conclude that the CF activity can be characterized as combat activity. I recommend this claim be denied.
-------------------------------------------- June 17, 2005
Claimant alleges that on the above date at the above mentioned location, his brother xxxxx was traveling in his car with rugs that he was taking to a rug store to sell. He was shot by U.S. soldiers, and the rugs and cash on his possession were never recovered...and his body left there.
I recommend approving this claim in the amount of $3,000.00
----------------------------------------------
April 23, 2006, Samarra
Claimant alleges that Coalition Forces fired upon his two sons as they were leaving the market. The claimants sons waived their shirts and their underwear as a sign of peace. The claimant provided death certificates, legal expert and witness statements to substantiate the
claim.
Opinion: There is not enough evidence to prove the claim.
Recommendation: The claim is denied.
-------------------------------------------------
Greg Mitchell goes on to say - "In a column at that time, I asked: How common is the practice? And how many unnecessary deaths do the numbers seem to suggest?
It's necessary to ask because the press generally has been denied information on civilian killings and, in recent years, it has become too dangerous in much of Iraq for reporters to go out and investigate shootings or alleged atrocities."
Posted at 10:27 am by deadringer
Permalink
4.14.2007
GAP BETWEEN THE RICH AND POOR WORLDWIDE YAWNS
The above cartoon is an attempt at humor, unfortunately what we are talking about is no laughing matter (to be fair there is a subtle hint in the cartoon, that this gap between the rich and poor is not some unrelated incident). We may be getting to the time soon, like in the late 19th century, when there are riots in the streets over the yawning gap. It certainly does not disprove what I have been saying over and over again in this blog, that all governments do is protect and enrich the few while the rest become disenfranchised.
The gap is better hidden now, not like the robber baron days of yesteryear. However, every year the removal of the estate taxes looms before the ruling bodies, and it get's closer to passing every time. The increase in the wealth of the few is beyond belief, while all those who are not in the top echelons have seen a decline in their net worth.
Do you think that all this wealth was earned by good ol' hard work? Think again, the wealthy have between one half to two thirds of their wealth through inheritance. With that type of largess the top 1% grew 87%, the top 99th.99 percentile grew 181%, pretty interesting huh? The bottom 20% grew a MASSIVE 3%.....congress has given themselves a pay increase the last six years in a row. However, you have not heard a peep about this in the major (corporate) media, I wonder why?
In the year 2004, 23 million people used food stamps ( I am sure it has grown worse) compared to 17 million in 2000. we are seeing trickle down economics at it's best here! Many years ago Roosevelt saved capitalism from itself, but I see no Roosevelt on the horizon, do you? Some say an oligarchy and a democracy cannot co-exist side by side - but for you who have read this blog you can predict my answer - there is no democracy.
I am not sure whether you have noticed this or not, but this happens to be the same condition throughout the world, that is, this tremendous gap between the rich and the poor. Everybody is playing follow the leader with the United States - that is because they have created a system whereby this same ruse can go on an indefinite period of time, and the people do nothing about the problem. It is a real interesting racket.
In fact, it is being spread all over the world by elite interest in instruments like the IMF, the World Bank, "free market, and free trade," and by obvious force in areas like the ME and parts of Afirca where it is resisted. Where it is not resisted the "leaders," that is the ruling elite (sometimes one and the same with the corporate elite) continue to rob the people at the behest of this globalized system.
People have embraced this great divide as the "American Way," like apple pie and mom. Now things are splitting down the middle, we now have approximately 37 million families living in poverty, that is almost 13% of the population - THIS IS THE HIGHEST PERCENTAGE IN THE DEVELOPED WORLD!! Yet the tax burden on the rich is falling, not growing, the top 0.01% have seen their tax burden drop by 25 percent since 1980. Even Warren Buffet, the second richest man in the world has said that these tax cuts "scream of injustice."
There is an unavoidable crash about to take place, two polarized groups are about to clash - and because this same template for enriching the few is taking place all over the world it will happen on a global scale. This is the stuff that riots and revolutions are made of, but I have news for you, the elite will not heed this alarm.
Some will accuse saying - "you are just making obvious human nature." My reply is simple, if we grant that this is human nature, than it is equally true that men do create governments to preserve and create wealth for the few elite. However, it is equally wrong to say merely "what will be will be," that is like saying because someone has a propensity to kill people that we should just let it take place!
While this gap between the rich and the poor increases exponentially this administration brings cuts Medicare, Medicade and education to stop a spiraling deficit. There is no way for the poor to bridge this gap any longer, and economic mobility is NOW lower than that found in Canada, Denmark, Germany, Norway, Sweden and Finland. The two that are neck and neck in this tragedy are Britain and America - funny that these two are at the head of worldwide atrocities like the Iraq war, isn't it?
Some will say - "but it is good to have disparities because without them no one would have the incentive to do better." However, this have never been the case in America in the main - what is implied in America is what you see on TV, you know - those rich minorities, that made it big in sports or entertainment, etc. It is a ruse, a cruel lie - the rules have always been fixed in America, it is just that people like to believe in myths. Haratio Alger is alive and well in the mythology that the elite feed the masses.
When someone like Warren Buffet goes on to say "If class warfare is being waged in America, than my class is clearly winning" - this is not a sudden twinge in conscience, that is fear! The time to mobilize is now, and to strike like so many others in years gone by to gain democratic advance. If not now than when? (HERE IS AN EXPERIMENT FOR YOU, GO TO GOOGLE AND TYPE IN "GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR" AND JUST KEEP SCROLLING - ALMOST EVERY COUNTRY ON THIS ELITE GRAVY TRAIN WILL COME UP.)
Posted at 03:39 pm by deadringer
Permalink
4.12.2007
Posted at 06:33 pm by deadringer
Permalink
4.11.2007
RULE OF LAW AND POLITICAL PRISONERS
 There is a reason why I modified the use of the word "prisoners" with "political," I am talking about people wasting away in prisons in the United States for no other reason except political purposes. Throughout the prisons, which are expanding at an exponential rate in America, you will find specific prisoners of political war which are moderately known, and a vast majority which staggers the imagination incarcerated by institutional policy. Many sit in prison on trumped up charges that have nothing to do with the party imprisoned, and some are caught in the dragnet of political use of the judicial system through general policy. A government that is supposed to be for the people and by the people has devolved into an enemy of the people, and instead of being the land of opportunity American has become a veritable police state.  The people duly elected in both of the houses, the judicial system, and those in the administrative branch are like the Mafia. They allow areas to become dead zones by policies of neglect and principles of abandonment. They have turned once great cities into ghetto's by catering to their bastard children, the corporations - who use and abuse areas to build a profitable base only to abandon these areas. The governments, both local, regional, and national have given these corporations free passes from any direct responsibility - than the representatives further turn their backs on their poor constituency, and they woo them with fabrications and lies giving them temporary relief for political expedience.  The only things they do for people in these areas (above) is build prisons for them, and than they toughen the law by the stroke of a pen, making everything a felony. They bring drugs into the areas by their partnerships in crime, and than herd the people into their prisons so these vultures called corporations can feed off their slave labor. Why do they do this? Because they have no intention of building viable alternatives, helping to create employment, and preserving an area so it is fit for families to thrive.  So far we have been talking about those broad policies which are used through the established institutions to entrap millions of people - we now have the distinction of the largest prison population in the world - over 2 million people incarcerated! Than there are those brave souls which care for what is taking place, and try to lead the people out of these traps - the targeted political prisoners. Those like Leonard Peltier, Mumia Abu Jamal, Sami Al-Arian (our new prisoners of the "war on Terror") among the host of names. Any effective method of freeing, or attempting to free people from their oppression is met by imprisonment. These men and women sit rotting in a cell, which I guess is better than assassination.  (Sami Al-Arian, a political prisoner of the "war on Terror") So the question is what can we do about it? It has been going on so long and the opponents are so strong - I know all the excuses, they have played like an endless loop recording in my mind. Until we come to the conclusion that we will not stand for it any longer, and until we get up and get in the face of these officials - nothing will take place. Until millions of people march to the same tune and flood the streets with protest saying - WE ARE NOT GOING TO ALLOW THIS ANY LONGER, YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO LOCK US UP ALSO!! Until we stop asking for permission, and we stop playing by their perverted rules nothing of consequence can happen. When we hang our bodies on the line, and say enough is enough, that will be the beginning of the end for these oppressors.  We are not satisfied by their paltry affordable housing - we are not pleased with no health care net - and we will not allow viable jobs to continue to vacate while informal employment is proffered in their place. There is no room for compromise, and if you think there is, you are already defeated! We cannot settle for spoken good intentions which will NEVER materialize, but these unlucky people who sold their souls presently functioning in government of all levels will be put on notice - we will not stop till all the apparatus to oppress is torn down, and a TRUE government by the people, and for the people will rise again! It will take more than a designer protest, burning of candles, cute poetic chants - it will take hardened resistance on a massive scale, and an aggression that will not stop at the shedding of blood. Your brothers and sisters wait for you in their prison cells. "Extremism in the pursuit of freedom is no vice, and moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
Posted at 09:58 pm by deadringer
Permalink
4.10.2007
 We have here a meeting of the mindless, Olmert and Bush, not because they are stupid (although there has been some speculation about Bush), but mindless because they both entertain delusions - somewhat different but intimately intertwined. Hence the title, Dual Delusions.
 Both of these administrations are born of deceit, one who lied and now hundreds of thousands have died (Bush), and the other who feigns that he wants "peace" in the Middle East (actually, they both say this constantly) but instead we have nothing but the escalation of violence. Yet, since the time of their fateful meeting they have not only lied and deceived, but are now both equally self-deceived - they believe in strange and dangerous delusions.
 Since the time of their meeting both Bush and Olmert have had an epiphany! They have come to the realization that it is complete and total violence that is needed - so that they might cast their cares like two children who cast rocks into the sea. Of course, there is no peace plan, I am being sarcastic - only a plan of beating people into senseless submission to their design. Their recent victim being Lebanon, Iraq now the seasoned standby, and perhaps next Iran, all countries that do not deserve this wanton death and destruction.
 What warms the heart of every tried and true Zionist is either genocidal toward the Palestinians, or driving them out of the region - or into the sea if you like. So, the deadly delusion that Olmert clings to is that if he kills enough of those in the region who support the Palestinians, he can cause the Palestinians to fall limp to the ground having lost support through the destruction of their supporters - to completely destroy their hope. Plus, the other prong of this long fork is that he will please the United States, and receive more money for further aggression. However, the apple of Olmert's eye is the destruction of the Palestinians by whatever means necessary (and who knows where they will go from there). 
Bush's ultimate delusion (and the entire government in power) Is to hold ultimate sway over the Middle East and it's resources, i.e., oil - the "new Middle East." Like an unchecked animal he wants to destroy current non-compliant states in the region, and set up compliant and puppet rulers. Look at Iraq, that is his design for the entire region.
 The deaths of millions is of no consequence, the end justifies the means. It does not matter if the "job" is finished or in trouble in previous escapades, he must up the ante like a severely hooked gambler at the gambling table. Israel is merely a tool for his design in this region, and he has a desire for it to be secure so it can be used in the future as the immediate hand of imperial design.
 So we have dual and intersecting delusions taking place. The Palestinians become more uneasy and violent rather than falling limp to the ground with their hope crushed. Israel has now experiencing sound defeat in the battlefield, rather than a seamless victory. Iraq is about to explode rather than becoming a compliant state, and Iran even though it does not have a nuclear weapon must now rush to design one for self-preservation! WHILE ALL THESE SIGNS POINT TO FURTHER DISASTER, BOTH ISRAEL AND THE UNITED STATES CONTINUE THEIR MURDEROUS COURSE TOWARD SUICIDE CASTING THEIR JAUNDICED EYES TOWARD SYRIA AND IRAN. NOW THE SPECTER OF "LIMITED TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS" RAISES IT'S UGLY HEAD - PEOPLE, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!! THERE HAS TO BE A COMPLETE HOUSE CLEANING IN BOTH ISRAEL AND THE UNITED STATES - AND I MEAN BOTH CONVENTIONAL PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES, AND CLEAR DESIGN AND DIRECTION TOWARD PEACE RATHER THAN DESTRUCTIVE DELUSIONS. MORE DELUSIONS
Posted at 08:24 pm by deadringer
Permalink
4.9.2007
 Unfortunately TV is a mass media instrument, it is fed intravenously into the population. Information has been reduced to split seconds of time, and packed within those short moments is the impact of pervasive communication.
What sticks in the mind is what is spoken or displayed within those nanoseconds, so a short phrase can lambaste an entire population - especially when it is being portrayed rather poorly in the first place (generally speaking), and other institutions follow suit. What will stay is a charged image, this is what is done by expert communications - think of the political realm.
Let's use the term "flip-flop," as applied to John Kerry. One small phrase can prejudice the entire life long achievement of an individual. However, people like Kerry get multiple chances up to bat - this may be these girls only chance at limelight, and it has been besmirched by a bigot. Let alone the hard work of a dedicated woman who has been perfecting her coaching for decades (C. Vivian Stringer) - her moment of truth, she recruits "nappy-headed ho's"... IMUS CRAFTING IMAGES(Boy, they sure removed that first video I linked to fast, lets see how long this one lasts)
Posted at 08:11 pm by deadringer
Permalink
For four consecutive nights, the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) have invaded Balata Refugee Camp on the outskirts of Nablus (Palestine). They drove up and down the camp, threw percussion grenades and fired randomly at residents' homes.
This is not a new habit of the IOF, but something they've kept doing for many years already. It's important to note that this is not an exception, but normality in Balata Refugee Camp.
This film is ready for download in better quality at: https://video.indymedia.org/en/2007/03/7 81.shtml.
This short clip was done by close friends of a-films, the Research Journalism Initiative (RJI).
The author of this clip can be contacted at ripplescross[at]yahoo[dot]com.
Posted at 10:19 am by deadringer
Permalink
4.7.2007
NEOCOLONIALISM 101, EXAMPLE ZIMBABWE
 When one thinks of colonialism one sees occupation forces, invading armies putting down "insurrections" (think Iraq), the wanton murder of civilians in the streets by foreign powers, and the wholesale robbery plain for all who have eyes to see. However, there is now another form of oppression in vogue, after years of resistance from indigenous populations they are said to have won their "freedom."
Whereupon rather than the previous invading forces of colonialism being present in the classical sense, there is a systemic servility imposed, and much more subtle techniques used so that the previous colonial interest can be realized - it still has devastating effects upon the previous colonial object. This is called Neocolonialism, and today we are going to look at it in all it's inglorious splendor, having reached it's apex as part of globalization.
Neocolonialism is the structure embedded in the newly "free" country, which locks all of the doors of the country's prosperity from the inside out, that is, it makes the prosperity of the former colonial enterprise subservient to a system which does not have the interest of the people at heart. What it does is further enrich the former colonial perpetrators.
When this is ruptured by an democratically elected ruler, who has the interest of the people in mind, it unleashes an array of damaging acts meant to bring the country back under the thumb of it's colonial rulers. This can be displayed by looking at Zimbabwe as an example, and it's current president Robert Mugabe. What we are going to look at can be used as a template for what takes place all over the world in the neocolonial nightmare, it is by no means exhaustive but is meant to give you a taste of what the Euro-American enterprise is involved in all over the globe.
Some colonial history is necessary in regard to Zimbabwe, which was formerly the colonial prize of the UK, than called Rhodesia. The history is so twisted and sordid with exploitation and forced labor with pauperism that one could go on forever.
Named after Cecil Rhodes the rabid colonist and racist for his own interest, who built his financial empire on blood diamonds - they were blood diamonds whether you look under the current condition or the original colonial state. Rhodes used his British South African Company with it's own paramilitary force to control Matabeleland and Mashonaland which is present day Zimbabwe. Think of this the next time you want to honor a "Rhodes scholar."
 (1965) Where the present contention lies is in Mugabe taking back land that was stolen by the Rhodes gang in the 1890's, it was taken by force and each soldier that was a participant was given 9 square miles of territory. Of course, this land is the present bone of contention (but not the only one) in Zimbabwe.
For the stupid multitudes that believe that there is starvation in this country because of the land grab, you need to go back to the drawing board, because these farms produced "cash crops" like tobacco, and had nothing at all to do with food that sustained the people. So over 70% of the arable land belonged to 4,500 white farmers who were descendant's of the British settlers.
(picking cotton on white farm land)
It was the land and Mugabe's desire to give back this land to land-poor indigenous population that caused his head on collision with the neocolonial machine empowered by Western governments. A good portion of the farm land was held by absentee landowners, many the Lord's in jolly ol' England.
Because of the aggravated reasoning of the colonial thievery Mugabe had legislation passed that took back 1500 white farms without compensation. It was at this point, in the words of Zimbabwe's foreign minister Stan Mudenge - "all hell broke loose." Suddenly Zimbabwe's President Mugabe, who was democratically elected by a firm majority, became a "fraud and a horrible dictator."
 The imperialist Royal African Society meets in 1999, and their topic is "Zimbabwe - Time for Mugabe to go?" So the neocolonial grinding machine starts it's engine recommending - a military coup, buying the opposition, insurrection, subverting Mugabe's party. Washington get's into the ring a few months later sporting the "Zimbabwe Crisis."
NGO's are marshalled, and their job is to foment discontent and become the conduit for monies to unseat the president. They encourage people to take to the streets and have rallies and foment discontent and further unrest. Sanctions are applied and threats of bombings, all of this is supposed to make the people rise against the democratically elected government led by Robert Mugabe.
Everything is done to effect the people, so that everything bad they are experiencing is reflected by these foreign influences toward the government. In the end of this sordid affair brought on by the neocolonial machine the people are supposed to undo their own government.
All governments that pose a revolutionary alternative get the same treatment, the people are stirred up to give the "natural effect," and the questions about electoral fraud begin to fly. President Bush signed the "Zimbabwe Democracy and Recovery Act" in December 2001, this empowers the President under the US Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to "support democratic institutions, the free press and independent media" in Zimbabwe.
So suddenly these "home grown democratic movements" end up with all sorts of expensive paraphernalia to push their movement. Such as the Zvalawana movement in Zimbabwe - flashy stickers, phone cards, video's and audio, etc. In other words, they are armed with more than radical movements in the west have, their money comes from foreign hostile sources.
 Suddenly, all over the radios and TV's Zimbabwe's government, primarily Mugabe becomes the monster - the volume is turned up really high in the UK. Of course all of these sources are supposed to be democratic, inside and outside of the country all speaking against the government - so what is that supposed to make the Zimbabwe government? You guessed it, undemocratic.
When this is done during election time, as in the last election, and the opposition still loses than that is supposed to put the election into question - as during the 2005 elections. The reason why many of the oppositions tactics have not worked is because Mugabe's regime will not put up with subversion from within.
Take for instance, NGO's which actually work as a fifth column for foreign interest - they must divulge their financing, this cuts them off almost immediately. Media, like CNN which works for foreign interest is not allowed to report from inside of Zimbabwe. People scream that this is not democratic, but this opposition is clearly financed by hostile sources, so the point is moot.
To say that Zimbabwe's ills do not come from drought is patently false, particularly since the country is agriculturally based, especially in light of this phenomena happening all over the region. As I said previously, land redistribution did not destroy Zimbabwe's agricultural source, IT WAS DESTROYED BY WHITE AGRICULTURAL CASH CROPS SUCH AS TOBACCO!
To say that sanctions have not destroyed the economy is equally ridiculous, sanctions are not economically neutral. They disrupt assistance to the country, disrupt the flow of trade and cut off investment prospects. The sanctions cannot be isolated in the government, it hurts and can even kill people.
Once again for some emphasis and elaboration, why does the West want Mugabe out? Remember, you can almost use this as a template for all neocolonial activity in other nations. Neocolonial's always want to uproot the policies of revolutionary governments, and they want to replace them with their own repressive policies.
There are five reasons they want to oust him, and none of them have to do with humanitarian reasons. First, Mugabe got rid of IMF (International Monetary Fund) policies in the 90's, because all they were doing was impoverishing the people to pay a debt through currency devaluation, reduction of social programs, and all this to pay debt at any human cost.
 (IMF vultures Africa) Mugabe has also shown signs of resistance to Western design in nearby countries. He has sent troops into the Congo that have frustrated the will of Anglo alliance.
Mugabe's economic policies are not compatible with neo-liberal policies. Recently he announced the nationalization of the diamond mines, now this is a real problem for western powers, nationalization and enrichment of the people. It gets rid of the darling of privatization, that is, all the money going into the pockets of an elite foreign few.
He has demanded that a portion of the earnings be reinvested in the country, and places this as a performance requirement on foreign investors. As an example, they are required to invest in government bonds - this really makes them blow their stacks!
 Fouth reason, British companies dominate Zimbabwe's country, and the British governments and banks want to protect their investments. Neocolonialism lives in the domination of the country through the corporations and the investments, they want a ruler in power who will look after their interests no matter how much it destroys the people! Mugabe is not their man, and he will never be their man and they know it.
The fifth and final reason they want Mugabe out is, they do not want other neighboring countries to get the idea that they can be independent and help their people prosper - they take it as a bad example. Imagine if the other countries took up the same process - why, Africa after a period of time might be free and independent!
As you can see there is neocolonial and neo-liberal interest all over Africa, they have it sliced up like a pie. People in America wonder why there is so much unrest in the world, well, you got a taste of it above, and you can apply it like a template all over the world.
THERE IS NO INTENT AMONG THE EURO-AMERICAN ALLIANCE TO HAVE SOME FORM OF EGALITARIAN GLOBALISM, THEY WANT TO ACCELERATE THE SLAVERY OF THE THIRD WORLD, THEY WANT TO PUT THEIR DIVESTMENT AND DESTRUCTION ON THE FAST TRACK! THIS IS WHAT YOU ARE DEALING WITH IN YOUR GOVERNMENTS, THIS IS HOW THEY OPERATE, AND IT IS TIME FOR THE PEOPLE TO WAKE UP AND PUT A HALT TO THIS MURDEROUS PROCESS!
Posted at 01:50 pm by deadringer
Permalink
4.5.2007
 Perhaps the most insidious way to perpetrate a lie is to institutionalize it, that is, giving the veneer of respectability by making it something that everyone participates in and supports. People give their whole lives to institutions and their growth, going to their grave with a smile on their faces believing that they have contributed to the betterment of mankind.
Take for instance, our school system - what a noble career, to try to mold young minds to face the rigors of life. What if the structure of the institution enslaves people rather than furthering their lives, what if it is filled with lies and half-truths that prejudice the young mind? What if it is meant to make one a pliant model citizen, and removes all form of critical thinking from the process of "education?" What if it raises a people who are docile in the face of atrocities committed by it's so called leaders? Yes, this is what we have come to in America.
(We don't need no education, by salihguler, at Deviant Art)
WE DON'T NEED NO EDUCATION What would happen if you suddenly became aware of the fact that there is no rule of law, that it was a ruse, merely and extension of the divine right of kings? That the enumeration of "laws" was merely a convenient way to alienate you from your rights? That there was no rule of law because it was not universally applicable, and only a choice few could gainsay this code? That the usurpation of individual sovereignty that is absorbed by the state means you do not live in a democracy, but some form of plutocracy?
What if suddenly you realized that the idea of representative government is a joke, and that your representatives did not listen to you or the average person they were supposed to represent? That instead they only listened to the powerful as represented in corporations? That there was no one who would go to bat for you, like the mythical Mr. Smith in Washington?
What if you began to see that your elected representatives did not have your best interest in heart? That all of the protections and benefits that you fought so hard for were systematically being removed? So that suddenly you found yourself out on the street with no remedy, left to the cruel elements?
 What if you found out that all of the wars that have been fought, one's that you might have participated in were for the only purpose of enriching the select few? That as time went on it became more and more obvious to you that the only people who benefit in a war are the rich which you cannot find on the battlefield? That all wars did was squander the money of the people so that a few corporations could make out like bandits (literally)?
(Rupert Lees, Blind)
BLINDWhat would happen if you suddenly saw extra-constitutional agencies, clandestine, suddenly arrayed together at home, under the guise of the protection of the people? That those "rights" which every American claims to possess are stricken from their column? That the very core of their defense against a despotic government, habeas corpus, was summarily removed? That suddenly you found yourself with no privacy, and that you were being watched from almost every quarter - indeed, you find yourself in a virtual panopticon?
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?Indeed, that is the question (above), what would you do? Well I have news for you, what I have just elaborated is the truth. Is this the country you want? If you can't see it than you are blind, it's coming at you like a freight train full speed.
It is time for a reckoning in the Capitol by the people, and I am not talking about a token march where you burn candles and chant, this literally is an all out war. Not only are the people domestically being divested, but this administration is not satisfied with the illegal wars it has started nor the hundreds of thousands it has killed - it is clogging the Persian Gulf with war ships preparing to bomb Iran. You elected leaders have not listened to you, they have been virtual partners in all that I have written above, you have a rogue government in rebellion to the people.
Posted at 08:07 pm by deadringer
Permalink
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
